Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Giants in Scripture and in the world

 



by

Damien F. Mackey

 

“The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—

when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown”.

 Genesis 6:4

  

As the above text indicates, giants have existed both before and after the great Flood.

 

Evidence for giants can be found throughout the world – though one always has to be on guard against fakes:

Were There Giants? What the Evidence Actually Shows - ScienceInsights

“By the 1800s, public fascination with giants was so intense that it became profitable to fake them. The most famous case is the Cardiff Giant, unearthed on October 16, 1869, on a farm in Cardiff, New York. Two laborers digging a well hit stone three feet down, cleared the soil, recognized the shape of a foot, and eventually uncovered a ten-foot-tall stone figure of a man. Crowds paid to see it, and many believed it was a petrified ancient giant.

The whole thing was a setup. The farm’s owner, William Newell, had buried the statue the year before. His cousin George Hull, an atheist and amateur science enthusiast, had carved it to make a point about the tension between science and religious faith. Hull wasn’t wealthy, and the scheme was also designed to make money, which it did. The giant became so popular that P.T. Barnum offered to buy it. When the owners refused, Barnum simply made a replica and displayed that instead, claiming his was the real one. The owners tried to sue, but the judge reportedly said, “Bring your giant here, and if he swears to his own genuineness, you shall have your injunction.” By December 1869, Hull confessed, and the hoax collapsed”.

 

President Abe Lincoln, himself of unusual configuration, which some call “gigantism”, is purported to have been interested in the discovery of giants in North America.

 

 

The ancestors of the giants, the Anakim, about whom the Israelite spies reported (Numbers 13:33), had apparently survived from the raid of the four northern kings at the time of Abram - about half a millennium earlier - when giant peoples such as the Rephaïtes (Deuteronomy 3:11), the Zuzites (Deuteronomy 2:20 links them with the Zamzummim, another clan of great stature) and the Emites, “a people great, numerous, and tall” (Deuteronomy 2:10-11), were overcome (Genesis 14:5).  


Later, as the army of Israel will make its way through Transjordania (Dr. Osgood distinguishes this region, as IV, from the Early Bronze III civilisations in Canaan), they will encounter, and defeat, the fearsome Og, giant king of Bashan.

(The account of Og’s defeat is recorded in several passages, including Numbers 21:33-35Deuteronomy 3:1-11, and Joshua 12:4-5). 

 

“Og king of Bashan”, we read, “was the last of the Rephaïtes. His bed was decorated with iron and was more than nine cubits long and four cubits wide. It is still in Rabbah of the Ammonites”. Og’s bed was about 14 feet long and 6 feet wide or about 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide.

Now, that’s a giant!

 

While some ancient Jewish legends can be helpful to the point of being vital, I think that we can take with a grain of salt the one that has King Og clinging to Noah’s Ark:

The Amazing Story of Og, the Giant King of Bashan | Mayim Achronim

“Midrashic texts famously record that Og was the only survivor of the Great Flood, aside from Noah and his family. When the torrential rains began, Og jumped onto the Ark and held on tightly (Zevachim 113b). He swore to Noah that he would be his family’s eternal servant if Noah would allow him into the Ark (Yalkut Shimoni, Noach 55). The Talmud (ibid.) states that the rain waters of the Flood were actually boiling hot. Yet, the rain that fell upon Og while he held unto the Ark was miraculously cool, allowing him to survive”.

 

Was Og the original Procrustes?

 

As Einstein would have said, it is all relative. (Or, as a football guru once remarked: ‘You don’t have to be Norman Einstein to …’).

 

Therefore, when speaking of giants, it needs to be noted that human beings were on average somewhat smaller, or shorter, than are those of our own era.

The Neanderthals, perhaps the long-lived antediluvians, who continued on for a time after the Flood, were not necessarily tall, but they were apparently very strong, with marvellous eyesight far surpassing our own, and with a much longer life expectancy.

 

Again, the walled cities in Canaan that Israel’s spies described as being “fortified and very large” (Numbers 13:28), would be miniscule by comparison with our own cities. But to an invading people lacking siege weaponry, even a relatively small, walled city would loom as formidable.

 

One does not need to be a giant to be very strong.

 

There is no indication, for instance, that the immensely powerful Samson was an actual giant – except in his faith (cf. Hebrews 11:32).


And this man in the 1930’s, who pulled a full bus with his teeth, was certainly no giant.

 

Could you do this?
He pulled this loaded bus along with his teeth. This actually happened in 1935 or 36.

 

The Philistines, not included in the report of the spies - but figuring at the time of Abram, and then, again, at the time of kings Saul and David - appear to have been a tall race, including various giants, such as Goliath.

 

Also needing to be taken into account is the fact that the reluctant spies exaggerated the truth, so that, now: “All the people we saw there are of great size” (Numbers 13:32). 

 

And, again (13:33):We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim)”.

 

Any mention of the Nephilim, either then, or today, is bound to attract interest. 

What is the significance of the fact there were giants in those days (Genesis 6:4)? | GotQuestions.org
Genesis 6 records the expansion of the human race and its descent into further corruption. The writer records that there were “giants on the earth in those days” (Genesis 6:4, NKJV) and offers a brief explanation of how that came to be.

 

As humanity multiplied and began to be numerous on the earth (Genesis 6:1), the “sons of God” took wives (Genesis 6:2), and they began to increase. In light of the rapid multiplication of humanity and its evil, God limited the human lifespan to one-hundred, twenty years (Genesis 6:3). Prior to that time, people lived a very long time—even up to around nine hundred years (see Genesis 5). Though lifespans were decreasing on their own, God intervened to limit them greatly. Despite this significant limitation, there were giants (Hebrew, Nephilim) in those days—in the days of Noah. These were mighty men of renown and were apparently the products of relationships between the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men” (Genesis 6:4).

 

The giants in those days were extraordinary, leading some to suppose that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 are fallen angels and not merely regular people. In that theory, these fallen angels took on physical form and procreated with women. The demon-human hybrid DNA resulted in giant size and, apparently, enhanced physical abilities.

 

There are three objections to this theory: First, there is nothing in the text that suggests the “sons of God” are angels. While the phrase can be used of angels (as it is apparently in Job 1:62:1, and 38:7), it is also regularly used of people (e.g., Matthew 5:9 and Luke 20:36). Second, there is no indication that angels are physiologically compatible with women and can procreate with them (unless this is the only instance).

 

Third, the theological implications are significant enough that one might expect some further explanation. Instead, we only see the offspring referred to as “giants” (Nephilim) and mighty, but nothing beyond that.

 

Others have suggested that the sons of God might be people possessed by demonic beings. As in the other view, the phrase sons of God would still refer to fallen angels. While this view would resolve the physiological implications, there is nothing in the text that would suggest this possibility.

 

A third view is that there were giants in those days simply because humanity hadn’t been fully genetically corrupted—everyone was big and tall and mighty—and God intervenes to shorten human lifespans. This theory takes the biblical account at face value, that these sons of God were simply men. In any case, there were giants in the land at this time before the flood and “afterward” (Genesis 6:4). There were still giants during the time of Israel’s conquest of Canaan (Numbers 13:33) and David’s time (1 Samuel 17:4–7). If these Nephilim were superhumans resulting from demonic and human cohabitation, it seems they would have died in the flood (Genesis 7:21–23). The fact that they were still around after the flood is either evidence that the fallen angels performed the same act again at some point after the flood, or it is another indicator in support of the third view that these giants on the earth from time to time were exceptional, but not superhuman. ….

[End of quote]

 

The view that (fallen) angels are able to have offspring with human beings seems metaphysically ridiculous. However, it is apparent from the story of Sarah in the Book of Tobit, that these malevolent entities are not beyond lusting after human persons. Asmodeus, described as “the worst of demons”, and jealous of the beautiful Sarah, will bump off seven consecutive of her husbands, until young Tobias, guided by the healing archangel Raphael, will come and save the day.

 

The girl had been driven to the verge of suicide (Tobit 3:10).

 

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Ancient handbags of consistent design emerge across vastly different cultures

 



If ever we needed proof for the common origins of our world civilisations.

 

Andriy Nurzhynskyy has written

 

Ancient Handbags: Mysterious Sacred Objects

Found Across Ancient Civilizations

 

Ancient handbags have puzzled archaeologists and researchers for decades.

 

Mysterious symbols appear in artwork and artifacts from multiple ancient civilizations, from the Sumerians to the Mayans. These peculiar accessories appear in carvings, statues, and paintings dating back thousands of years.

 

Even more intriguing is the striking similarity between these depictions despite vast geographical distances and cultural differences. The bags often appear in the hands of gods and rulers, suggesting they hold significant ceremonial or spiritual importance.

 

Modern researchers continue to debate their true purpose and contents while examining the connection between these ancient accessories and their potential role in human civilization’s development.

 

The Mystery of Ancient Handbags in Early Civilizations

 

Ancient handbag depictions appear across multiple civilizations separated by vast distances and periods, creating an archaeological enigma. Archaeological findings at Göbekli Tepe in Turkey reveal handbag-like artifacts dating to 10,000-8,000 BCE [sic], marking some of the earliest known representations.

 

These mysterious objects demonstrate consistent patterns across civilizations:

….

The distribution of similar handbag symbols extends to:

 

  • Mesopotamian stone carvings
  • New Zealand Maori artifacts
  • Native American petroglyphs
  • Turkish archaeological sites
  • Mexican ancient ruins

 

Archaeological evidence indicates these handbag symbols transcend purely practical purposes. Their appearance in religious contexts suggests symbolic significance, while their presence in multiple unconnected civilizations points to a shared cultural understanding. The consistent representation of these objects in the hands of deities creates questions about their role in ancient spiritual practices.

 

The repetitive nature of these handbag motifs across different geographical locations challenges conventional explanations of cultural diffusion. Their presence in isolated civilizations without known contact raises questions about independent development versus ancient global connections.

 

Sacred Handbag Symbols in Mesopotamian Art

 

Mesopotamian art features distinctive symbols resembling handbags carried by divine figures. Archaeological evidence reveals these objects appear frequently in Sumerian and Assyrian reliefs dating from 4000-1750 BCE.

 

The Anunnaki’s Divine Handbags

 

Archaeological findings indicate these objects were ritual buckets carried by gods and minor deities called Apkallu. Sumerian texts identify them as containers used in sacred tree-watering ceremonies, particularly for date palms. Consistent depictions show divine figures holding these bucket-like objects in precise positions during ceremonial scenes.

 

Theories About Their Sacred Contents

 

Several interpretations exist regarding the contents and purpose of these ceremonial vessels:

 

  • Ritual Water – Archaeological evidence supports their use as containers for purified water in tree-watering ceremonies
  • Sacred Offerings – Depictions show the ships associated with religious rituals involving food or plant materials
  • Ceremonial Tools – Some reliefs portray the containers alongside other ritual implements used by priests
  • Divine Objects – Ancient texts reference these vessels as carriers of divine powers or celestial wisdom
  • Agricultural Symbols – The buckets’ association with date palm cultivation suggests agricultural significance

 

The artistic representations maintain remarkable consistency across different periods of Mesopotamian civilization, indicating their established role in religious practices.

 

Ancient Egyptian Handbags and Ceremonial Use

 

Ancient Egyptian handbags served dual purposes as practical carriers and sacred ceremonial objects. These accessories held profound symbolic significance in religious rituals and burial practices.

 

Materials and Construction

 

Ancient Egyptian craftsmen created handbags using Indigenous materials:

 

  • Woven grass fibers interlaced with sedges for durability
  • Reed stalks combined with flax for structural strength
  • Date palm leaves braided with doum palm fibers
  • Leather pieces stitched together for elite accessories

 

The construction methods involved:

 

  • Intertwining multiple plant materials for reinforcement
  • Weaving techniques that created durable carrying surfaces
  • Strategic placement of stronger materials at stress points
  • Decorative elements incorporated into the weave patterns

 

Royal Accessories in Hieroglyphs

 

Egyptian hieroglyphic depictions feature handbags in significant contexts:

 

  • Sacred scenes showing priests carrying ritual pouches
  • Royal processions with attendants holding ceremonial bags
  • Funerary art displaying protective amulets in bags
  • Temple walls adorned with images of deities holding sacred containers

 

  • The divine connection between handbags and religious ceremonies
  • Specific placement of bags for sacred objects
  • Detailed illustrations of bag designs indicating status
  • Consistent patterns in depiction across different periods

….

 

Mysterious Handbags in Mayan and Aztec Carvings

 

Ancient Mesoamerican civilizations incorporated distinct handbag symbols in their artistic expressions, mirroring similar motifs in other ancient cultures. These representations appear in various ceremonial contexts, suggesting their significance in religious practices.

 

Cross-Cultural Similarities

 

Ancient handbag symbols transcend geographical boundaries, appearing in multiple civilizations:

 

  • Sumerian stone reliefs display identical handbag motifs in religious ceremonies
  • Assyrian artworks feature similar depictions in divine contexts
  • Dogon tribes of Africa incorporate comparable symbols in wall paintings
  • Ancient American petroglyphs contain matching handbag-like designs
  • Turkish archaeological sites reveal related symbolic patterns
  • Maori artifacts from New Zealand showcase parallel representations

 

1.      A universal cultural understanding of their significance

2.      Possible ancient communication networks between civilizations

3.      Independent development of similar symbolic representations

4.      Common religious or ceremonial purposes

 

Modern Archaeological Interpretations

 

Archaeological studies reveal ancient handbags served multiple functions across diverse civilizations, combining practical utility with profound symbolic significance. Modern interpretations focus on understanding these artifacts through advanced scientific analysis and cultural context studies.

 

Practical vs. Ceremonial Purposes

 

Ancient handbags balanced everyday functionality with ceremonial importance across various societies. Archaeological evidence from Mesopotamian sites shows that these bags contained practical items like tools and ritual objects such as incense or sacred herbs. The craftsmanship of recovered specimens indicates distinct categories:

 

Everyday Items:

 

  • Storage containers for personal belongings
  • Carriers for trade goods
  • Portable vessels for food transportation

 

Ceremonial Functions:

 

  • Ritual containers for religious offerings
  • Status symbols in religious ceremonies
  • Sacred vessels for specific ceremonies

….

 

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Dried-up branch of the Nile ran alongside ancient pyramids and capital of Memphis

 


 

“The discovery may explain why pyramid fields were concentrated along this strip

of desert near the ancient Egyptian capital of Memphis, as they would have been easily accessible via the river branch at the time of their construction”.

 

Sean McShee  

 

A new branch of the Nile discovered in Egypt - Africa, Middle East, News, Uncovering the Past, World

 

A new branch of the Nile discovered in Egypt

 

By Sean McShee  | July 10, 2024

 

TWH –  The science journal, Communications Earth, and Environment, published evidence of an ancient, now dried-up and silted-over branch of the Nile. The research is from the Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of North Carolina – Wilmington. The authors of that study, Eman Ghoneim et al., named this branch the “Ahramat Branch.” In Arabic, “Ahramat” means “pyramids.” The discovery may explain why pyramid fields were concentrated along this strip of desert near the ancient Egyptian capital of Memphis, as they would have been easily accessible via the river branch at the time of their construction.

 

During the age of pyramid building, construction supplies moved along this branch. That waterway also brought people to perform the rituals of the Cult of the Dead Pharaoh. Ghoneim and her colleagues found that many of the pyramids had causeways ending at the proposed riverbanks of the Ahramat Branch, suggesting the river was used for transporting construction materials.

 

The Ahramat Branch helps to explain why the Egyptians built the pyramids where they did.

 

The height of the water in that branch varied over time, as did the locations where the pyramids were built. The distance between the banks of that branch and the pyramids also varies.

 

Ghoneim et al. discussed the changes in land and water in North Africa. These changes influenced the Ahramat as well as ancient Egypt.

 

The Cult of the Pharaoh

 

No pyramid was merely the beautifully decorated final resting place of a dead Pharaoh. Pyramids formed parts of ceremonial complexes, which were key elements of the Cult of the (Dead) Pharaoh. Next to the pyramid stood the mortuary temple, where the Pharaoh’s cult continued after death. Egyptians built valley temples on waterways, and a causeway linked the valley temple with the mortuary temple.

 

Many of these causeways ended at and ran at right angles to the bank of the Ahramat Branch. Ghoneim et al. argued that the valley temples functioned as river harbors.

….

“The Ahramat Branch borders a large number of pyramids dating from the Old Kingdom to the 2nd Intermediate Period and spanning between Dynasties 3 and 13.” via Communications Earth, and Environment

 

Climate change in ancient North Africa

 

As the last Ice Age ended around 10,000 B.C.E., [sic] sea levels rose, and the area now known as the Sahara began to transform from an arid desert to a savannah-like environment with large river systems and lake basins. Scientists have labeled this period as the African Humid Period (12,500 to 3000 B.C.E.).

 

….

 

The Old Kingdom of Egypt began around 2700 B.C.E. [Mackey: More like 2000 BC]

 

The Great Sphinx and Pyramids of Gizeh (Giza), 17 July 1839,

by David Roberts [public domain

 

The Ahramat Branch

 

The Nile had a much greater water volume during the African Humid Period, which lessened during the Old Kingdom. This period saw the Nile frequently branching off, including the Ahramat Branch. As northeastern Africa became more arid, the Nile and its branches carried less water. The desert expanded, water levels dropped, and some branches dried up.

 

In the developed world, rivers seldom run free and are often managed, like the Colorado River, which functions as a de facto water management system. The developed world keeps tight control over waterways. Before humans had such control, rivers meandered, branched off, flooded, and changed course naturally.

 

The Ahramat Branch was not a small creek. Before humans began to control rivers, their length, depth, and width varied significantly.

 

Mackey: For the massive technological and infrastructural innovations, dams and waterways, created during the time of Joseph of Egypt’s Famine, see e.g. my article (esp. Part Two):

 

Imhotep Enigma, his pharaoh was not Djoser, and proof for Egypt’s Third Dynasty Famine

 

(1) Imhotep Enigma, his pharaoh was not Djoser, and proof for Egypt’s Third Dynasty Famine

 

Ghoneim et al. reported that the Ahramat had a depth between 2 and 8 meters (6.6 to 26.2 feet), a length of 64 kilometers (39.8 miles), and a width between 200 to 700 meters (656.2 to 2,296.6 feet).

 

Egyptian civilization developed in the context of declining rainfall, which meant less water in the Nile and its branches. As the Sahara grew larger, the risk of sandstorms increased, causing branches of the Nile to silt up. Its banks grew more solid, and marshlands disappeared. The Nile itself and its branches began to move eastward, marking the beginnings of the Old Kingdom ….

 

From west to east, Egypt can be described as three regions: the Western Desert Plateau, the Nile floodplain, and the Eastern Desert. The Western Desert Plateau lies between the western border and the Nile floodplain, which bisects Egypt and provides the main water source. The Eastern Desert lies between the Nile floodplain and the Red Sea.

 

The Ahramat Branch flowed between the Nile and the Western Desert Plateau. According to Ghoneim et al., the volume of water in the Ahramat varied over time. When it carried more water, it overflowed its main banks and covered more ground. The distance between the Ahramat and the pyramids under construction also varied.

 

When the water in the Ahramat rose higher, the Egyptians built the pyramids further west. When the water fell lower, they built the pyramids closer to the Ahramat Branch.

There is no consensus on why the Old Kingdom collapsed. One theory suggests that failures of the Nile to flood adequately over several years led to famine, which in turn led to the collapse of the Old Kingdom.

 

Soil cores extracted from the area around Memphis show 3 meters (9.8 feet) of sand, likely deposited by sandstorms from the growing desert. This sand would have pushed the Nile and its branches eastward, potentially overwhelming the Nile’s low-lying branches.

 

Like political boundaries, rivers can change. In 2007, John K. Hillier et al. estimated that at Luxor in southern Egypt, the Nile had migrated 2 to 3 kilometers (1.2 to 1.9 miles) per 1,000 years.

 

Two factors drove the eastward migration of the Nile and its branches: continued desertification of the Sahara, which increased the amount of windblown sand, and a low volume of water in the river and its branches, which caused more silting. When sandstorms and low water occurred together, the process accelerated. Additionally, northern Egypt sits on a fault line and is prone to earthquakes. Over time, fault line movements caused a relative tilt downwards to the northeast, contributing to the drying up of the Ahramat Branch.

 

The Ahramat Branch disappeared during the New Kingdom, roughly 1550 to 1070 B.C.E. [sic].

 

An early photograph of the Great Pyramid,

taken by Frédéric Goupil-Fesquet in 1839 [public domain]

 

The zone of interest

 

In ancient Egypt, the major cities and monuments straddle the banks of the Nile. The ancient Egyptians built their monuments at the margins of the Nile floodplain. As the volume of water in the Nile and its branches changed, so did those margins.

 

Eman Ghoneim et al. examined a zone of interest west of the Nile, extending from the Lisht Pyramid complex northward to the Giza Pyramid complex. This zone contains the largest concentration of pyramids (31) in Egypt. The Egyptians built these pyramids from the Old Kingdom to the Second Intermediate Period, roughly from 2700 to 1650 B.C.E.[sic]. Memphis, the capital of the Old Kingdom, is located on the Nile across from this zone. Until now, the reason for this dense concentration had never been clear. The Ahramat Branch would have provided transit for building those ceremonial complexes.

“Many of us who are interested in ancient Egypt are aware that the Egyptians must have used a waterway to build their enormous monuments, like the pyramids and valley temples, but nobody was certain of the location, the shape, the size or proximity” to the pyramids, says lead author Eman Ghoneim in a statement. “Our research offers the first map of one of the main ancient branches of the Nile at such a large scale and links it with the largest pyramid fields of Egypt.”

 

The Ahramat branch could have provided transport to major pyramid sites. Those sites include the Giza, Abusir, Saqqara, Dahshur, and Lisht pyramid complexes. That article quoted lead archaeologist Ghoneim. She said the Nile served as a “lifeline in a largely arid landscape.” It provided both sustenance and easy transport of goods and building materials. She continued “For this reason … most of the key cities and monuments were in close proximity to the banks of the Nile and its peripheral branches.”

….