Sunday, October 11, 2026

Sword-wielding Priests and Levites

 



by

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

For, did not Jesus Christ, with Whom Moses would appear on the

Mount of Transfiguration, enjoin upon his disciples to put away their swords (Matthew 26:52): ‘Put your sword back in its place because all who take up

the sword will perish by the sword’. For God’s weakness (nailed to a Cross)

is greater than any human strength (swords and armour).

 

When righteous killing, so to speak, had to be done throughout the Old Testament, often priests (who are Levites) or (non-priest) Levites were the ones who carried it out.

 

Levi and Simeon

 

The first instance of this is the case of the eponymous Levite, Levi, son of Jacob, when he - in partnership with his brother, Simeon - would revenge the ‘rape’ of his sister, Dinah, by the Canaanite prince, Shechem, son of Hamor (Genesis 34).

 

The cunning Israelite pair devised a ruse whereby they would promise to allow the pagan Shechem to marry Dinah, with whom he had fallen in love, and to allow inter-marriages, if every Shechemite male be circumcised.

 

That agreed, the brothers waited until the effects of the circumcision took effect before they went amongst the pagans with the sword and slew all of the males (34:25-26):

 

On the third day, when they were still in pain, two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and came against the city unawares and killed all the males. They killed Hamor and his son Shechem with the sword and took Dinah out of Shechem’s house and went away.

 

The father Jacob, who had hoped to settle peacefully in the land, and so had no intention of avenging the plight of his daughter, was thus furious with Levi and Simeon (vv. 30-31):

 

Then Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, ‘You have brought trouble on me by making me odious to the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites and the Perizzites; my numbers are few, and if they gather themselves against me and attack me, I shall be destroyed, both I and my household’. But they said, ‘Should our sister be treated like a prostitute?’

 

Levi, Simeon and Dinah all shared the same biological mother, Leah (cf. Genesis 29:33-34; 30:21).

 

Jacob on his deathbed, recalling the dramatic incident, would not hold back against Simeon and Levi, cursing ‘their anger’:

 

‘Simeon and Levi are brothers—
    their swords are weapons of violence.
Let me not enter their council,
    let me not join their assembly,
for they have killed men in their anger
    and hamstrung oxen as they pleased.

Cursed be their anger, so fierce,
    and their fury, so cruel!
I will scatter them in Jacob
    and disperse them in Israel’.

 

Scroll down the ages by about a millennium, to c. 700 BC, and we find the Simeonite heroine, Judith, on the eve of her bloody encounter with a new Shechem - (providentially coincidental that her abode was in Shechem, with which C.C. Torrey has wonderfully identified Judith’s town of “Bethulia”) - the Assyrian Commander-in-chief, “Holofernes”.

 

Judith, in her prayer to the Lord for strength, will recall the Shechem-Dinah incident, and will, unlike Jacob of old, laud her ancestor Simeon, whilst parochially failing even to mention Levi in the incident (Judith 9:2-4):

 

‘O Lord God of my ancestor Simeon, to whom you gave a sword to take revenge on those strangers who had torn off a virgin’s clothing to defile her, and exposed her thighs to put her to shame, and polluted her womb to disgrace her; for you said, ‘It shall not be done’—yet they did it; so you gave up their rulers to be killed, and their bed, which was ashamed of the deceit they had practiced, was stained with blood, and you struck down slaves along with princes, and princes on their thrones. 

You gave up their wives for booty and their daughters to captivity, and all their booty to be divided among your beloved children who burned with zeal for you and abhorred the pollution of their blood and called on you for help. O God, my God, hear me also, a widow.

 

Moses and the Levites

 

Moses, who had led armies for Pharaoh “Chenephres” (who was, e.g., Sesostris Neferkare), was presumably no stranger to sword, spear or bow. Would not his career in Egypt come to a dramatic end when he killed an Egyptian taskmaster and fled the land to escape the angry Pharaoh? (Exodus 2:11-15).

 

Soon after that, in Midian, Moses would ward off some shepherds who were harrassing Jethro’s daughters, thereby earning himself a Midianite wife, Zipporah (vv. 16-21).

 

While, after that we hear nothing more about Moses personally engaging in any fight, he who was “the mildest man, over all men that dwelled in earth” (Numbers 12:3), with Joshua taking up the rôle of sword wielder, we read that, in the aftermath of the incident of the Golden Calf, Levites went amongst the people with swords and slew about 3000 Israelites (vv. 25-29):

 

Moses saw that the people were running wild and that Aaron had let them get out of control and so become a laughingstock to their enemies. 

So he stood at the entrance to the camp and said, ‘Whoever is for the Lord, come to me’. And all the Levites rallied to him.

Then he said to them, “This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor’.” 

The Levites did as Moses commanded, and that day about three thousand of the people died. Then Moses said, ‘You have been set apart to the Lord today, for you were against your own sons and brothers, and he has blessed you this day’.

 

Moses, for his part, now envisioning far greater things, would raise up a bronze serpent as an anticipation of the healing Christ on the cross, and would, himself, pose cruciform, arms extended, so that Joshua would be able to defeat the army of Amalek.

 

In this way he was marvellously anticipating the Gospels.

For, did not Jesus Christ, with Whom Moses would appear on the Mount of Transfiguration, enjoin upon his disciples to put away their swords (Matthew 26:52):

 

‘Put your sword back in its place because all who take up the sword will perish by the sword’. For the weakness of God (nailed to a Cross) is stronger than any human strength (swords and armour) (cf. I Corinthians 1:25). 

 

Intervention of Phinehas, the Aaronite

 

Perhaps incited by the venal false prophet, Balaam (cf. Jude 1:11), pagan Moabite women will seek to corrupt the men of Israel at Shittim (Numbers 25:1-18):  

 

While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women, who invited them to the sacrifices to their gods. The people ate the sacrificial meal and bowed down before these gods. So Israel yoked themselves to the Baal of Peor. And the Lord’s anger burned against them.

The Lord said to Moses, ‘Take all the leaders of these people, kill them and expose them in broad daylight before the Lord, so that the Lord’s fierce anger may turn away from Israel’.

So Moses said to Israel’s judges, ‘Each of you must put to death those of your people who have yoked themselves to the Baal of Peor’.

Then an Israelite man brought into the camp a Midianite woman right before the eyes of Moses and the whole assembly of Israel while they were weeping at the entrance to the tent of meeting. When Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, saw this, he left the assembly, took a spear in his hand and followed the Israelite into the tent. He drove the spear into both of them, right through the Israelite man and into the woman’s stomach. Then the plague against the Israelites was stopped; but those who died in the plague numbered 24,000.

The Lord said to Moses, ‘Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, has turned my anger away from the Israelites. Since he was as zealous for my honor among them as I am, I did not put an end to them in my zeal. 

Therefore tell him I am making my covenant of peace with him. He and his descendants will have a covenant of a lasting priesthood, because he was zealous for the honor of his God and made atonement for the Israelites’.

The name of the Israelite who was killed with the Midianite woman was Zimri son of Salu, the leader of a Simeonite family. And the name of the Midianite woman who was put to death was Kozbi daughter of Zur, a tribal chief of a Midianite family.

The Lord said to Moses, ‘Treat the Midianites as enemies and kill them. They treated you as enemies when they deceived you in the Peor incident involving their sister Kozbi, the daughter of a Midianite leader, the woman who was killed when the plague came as a result of that incident’.

 

The zeal of Phinehas was recalled a millennium or so later by Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) (45:23-24; cf. Psalm 105:30-31, Douay):

 

Phinehas son of Eleazar is third in glory because of his zeal in the fear of the Lord, because he stood firm when the people revolted, with a staunch and courageous heart; and in this way made expiation for Israel.

Hence a covenant of peace was sealed with him, making him governor of both sanctuary and people, and securing to him and his descendants the high priestly dignity for ever.

 

Phinehas probably acquired his unusual name back in Egypt (Pa-nehasi pꜣ-nḥsj).

 

Two corrupt priest sons of Eli

 

One of this pair has the same name as the noble Phinehas (above), but that is where all similarity with that godly man ceases.

Jewish Virtual library tells the story of Eli’s two wicked sons: Hophni and Phinehas

 

HOPHNI AND PHINEHAS (Heb. חָפְנִי, Egyptian ḥfn (r), "tadpole"; Heb. פִּנְחָס, Egyptian pi-nḥsy, "the dark-skinned one"), the two sons of *Eli who served with him as priests in Shiloh (I Sam. 1:3).

 

The fact that both had Egyptian names may be explained by the family's Pharaonic connection (I Sam. 2:27). The Bible designates them "sons of *Belial," "thoroughly worthless individuals" (Sperling), and describes in detail the ways in which they abused their priestly privileges. They intimidated sacrificers into giving them meat for their own use (I Sam. 2:13–17), and took sexual advantage of the women who worked at the entrance to the tabernacle (I Sam. 2:22). Hophni and Phinehas disregarded their father's rebuke (2:22–25), and he did not admonish them further (3:13).

Accordingly, Eli received prophetic messages of doom (2:27–36; 3:11–18), foretelling, among other things, the death of Hophni and Phinehas on the same day (2:34). At the time of the battle between the Philistines and Israel at Aphek (I Sam. 4), the Ark of the Covenant of God was taken from Shiloh by Hophni and Phinehas in the belief that its presence on the battlefield would ensure victory. Instead, the results were disastrous: Israel's army was defeated, Hophni and Phinehas were killed, and the Ark was captured by the Philistines. When the news reached Eli (4:14ff.), he, too, died. Phinehas' pregnant wife went into labor on hearing of the calamity and died while giving birth. She called her orphaned son Ichabod ("where is the glory?"; 4:19–22).

The narrative of Hophni and Phinehas, which is also the account of the decline of the priestly house of Eli, is accompanied by the parallel narrative of the ascent of Samuel. The text emphasizes the character differences between Hophni and Phinehas and Samuel (cf. e.g., I Sam. 2:11 with 12; 2:13–17 with 18–20; 2:22–25 with 26).

 

[End of quote]

 

Unlike those other priests/Levites listed above, and below, Hophni and Phinehas were disastrous in fight and warfare, even to the extent of losing the Ark of the Covenant to the uncircumcised Philistines.

 

Samuel slays King Agag

 

One may be quite surprised to read of a great and wise prophet like Samuel completing the work that a belligerent king such as Saul had failed to do, by personally slaying the king of the Amalekites.

 

For that is what the priest Samuel did (I Samuel 15:24-33):

 

Then Saul said to Samuel, ‘I have sinned. I violated the Lord’s command and your instructions. I was afraid of the men and so I gave in to them. Now I beg you, forgive my sin and come back with me, so that I may worship the Lord’.

But Samuel said to him, ‘I will not go back with you. You have rejected the word of the Lord, and the Lord has rejected you as king over Israel!’

As Samuel turned to leave, Saul caught hold of the hem of his robe, and it tore. Samuel said to him, ‘The Lord has torn the kingdom of Israel from you today and has given it to one of your neighbors—to one better than you. He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a human being, that he should change his mind’.

Saul replied, ‘I have sinned. But please honor me before the elders of my people and before Israel; come back with me, so that I may worship the Lord your God’. So Samuel went back with Saul, and Saul worshiped the Lord.

Then Samuel said, ‘Bring me Agag king of the Amalekites’.

Agag came to him in chains. And he thought, ‘Surely the bitterness of death is past’.

But Samuel said, ‘As your sword has made women childless, so will your mother be childless among women’.

And Samuel put Agag to death before the Lord at Gilgal.

 

Prophet Jeremiah, Judah’s Defence Minister

 

Another surprise is to find that the good and noble prophet Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah, who became High Priest during the reign of the great reforming Judean king Hezekiah (who was Josiah), was also the king’s numero uno in the face of the Assyrian invasion:  

 

Jeremiah was both prophet and high priest

 

(4) Jeremiah was both prophet and high priest

 

For Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah, was all at once, (i) Isaiah’s “Eliakim son of Hilkiah” (22:20-24):

 

‘In that day I will summon my servant, Eliakim son of Hilkiah. I will clothe him with your robe and fasten your sash around him and hand your authority over to him. He will be a father to those who live in Jerusalem and to the people of Judah. I will place on his shoulder the key to the house of David; what he opens no one can shut, and what he shuts no one can open. I will drive him like a peg into a firm place; he will become a seat of honor for the house of his father. All the glory of his family will hang on him: its offspring and offshoots—all its lesser vessels, from the bowls to all the jars …’.

 

clearly a High Priest,

and he was (ii) Eliachim (Douay version), or Joakim, the priest of the Book of Judith, who oversaw the defence of Jerusalem (Judith 4:5):

 

And Eliachim the priest wrote to all that were over against Esdrelon, which faceth the great plain near Dothain, and to all by whom there might be a passage of way, that they should take possession of the ascents of the mountains, by which there might be any way to Jerusalem, and should keep watch where the way was narrow between the mountains.

 

And he was, again, King Hezekiah’s chief official, (iii) Eliakim, son of Hilkiah, who confronted the Assyrian Rabshakeh (2 Kings 18:18): “They called for the king, but Eliakim son of Hilkiah, who was over the household, Shebna the scribe, and Joah son of Asaph, the recorder, went out to them”.

Eliakim’s office here, “over the household”, is usually interpreted as Major domo, but should, instead, be “over the Tabernacle”, that is, the Temple, for of Shebna, whom Eliakim replaced, it was written, qui habitat in tabernaculo (Isaiah 22:16, Vulgate).

 

Finally, Jeremiah (Eliakim) was the otherwise unknown (iv) “Jehoiakim the high priest, the son of Hilkiah, son of Shallum”, of Baruch 1:7.

 

Jeremiah’s priestly office would later become, greatly spiritualised, that of the Apostle Peter:

 

Prophet Jeremiah and Saint Peter

 

(13) Prophet Jeremiah and Saint Peter

 

The prophet Jeremiah will now connect marvellously, mystically, with that giant of a warrior, Judas Maccabeus.

 

Judas Maccabeus and his brothers

 

Few Levites in the Bible wielded the sword more effectively than did Judas Maccabeus and his four brothers, despite these being few in number. With Divine assistance they were able to bring to their knees large, highly-experienced and well-armed Seleucid Greek armies.

Judas, faced with the formidable strength of the invading army of Nicanor, for instance, encouraged his men with the following account of a dream-vision that he had had of the prophet Jeremiah (2 Maccabees 15:6-16):

 

This Nicanor in his utter boastfulness and arrogance had determined to erect a public monument of victory over Judas and his men. But Maccabeus did not cease to trust with all confidence that he would get help from the Lord. And he exhorted his men not to fear the attack of the Gentiles, but to keep in mind the former times when help had come to them from heaven, and now to look for the victory which the Almighty would give them. 

Encouraging them from the Law and the prophets, and reminding them also of the struggles they had won, he made them the more eager. 

And when he had aroused their courage, he gave his orders, at the same time pointing out the perfidy of the Gentiles and their violation of oaths. He armed each of them not so much with confidence in shields and spears as with the inspiration of brave words, and he cheered them all by relating a dream, a sort of vision, which was worthy of belief.

What he saw was this: Onias, who had been high priest, a noble and good man, of modest bearing and gentle manner, one who spoke fittingly and had been trained from childhood in all that belongs to excellence, was praying with outstretched hands for the whole body of the Jews. Then likewise a man appeared, distinguished by his gray hair and dignity, and of marvelous majesty and authority. And Onias spoke, saying, ‘This is a man who loves the brethren and prays much for the people and the holy city, Jeremiah, the prophet of God’. Jeremiah stretched out his right hand and gave to Judas a golden sword, and as he gave it he addressed him thus: ‘Take this holy sword, a gift from God, with which you will strike down your adversaries’.

 

I belong to the Australian Marian Academy of the Immaculate Conception, and we have adopted the Golden Sword of Judas Maccabeus as our emblem.

 

The golden sword represented for Judas Maccabeus and his followers their Divine protection. It was not, of course, a sword that Judas would actually wield in battle. His preference for that, like David taking up the mighty sword of Goliath (I Samuel 21:9): ‘There is none like it. Give it to me’, was for the sword of the Syrian governor, Apollonius (I Maccabees 3:12): “Judas took the sword of Apollonius, and used it in battle the rest of his life”. 

 

2 Maccabees 3:5: “At this time Apollonius son of Thraseus was the governor of Greater Syria”. 

 

Given my collapsing of this phase of the Maccabean story into the era of the Infancy of Jesus Christ:

 

Judas the Galilean vitally links Maccabean era to Daniel 2’s “rock cut out of a mountain”

 

(13) Judas the Galilean vitally links Maccabean era to Daniel 2’s “rock cut out of a mountain”

 

this Apollonius looms as a possible candidate for Luke’s “Quirinius” (Luke 2:11-2): “In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. (This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.)”.

 

Ezra, as Esdras, with sword

 

In my article:

 

Ezra ‘Father of the Jews’ dying the death of Razis

 

(2) Ezra 'Father of the Jews' dying the death of Razis

 

I was able to identify Ezra as High Priest, and as the Esdras, and as Razis (Esdras name inverted), of Maccabees. There I wrote:

 

Thanks to a considerably truncated, revised chronology, I was able earlier in this article to suggest a connection – {one conventionally quite impossible} – of the significant personage, Razis of 2 Maccabees 14:1-46, of highly spectacular death, with the great priest-scribe himself, Ezra.

 

Ezra, or Esdras (= Razis), Razis, known as “the Father of the Jews” (v. 37).

 

So significant was this Razis that “Nicanor sent over 500 soldiers to arrest him” (v. 40), so as to deal a “severe blow” to the Jews.

 

Since my writing of the first part of this series, I have picked up in 2 Maccabees a couple of other points that do no harm to my theory that Razis was Ezra.

 

One: The elderly Razis was in possession of a “sword” at the time of his death (v. 41). And, a little earlier in 2 Maccabees, in chapter 12, we learn that Razis, there called Esdrias (cf. Ezra as Esdras) was even commanding Jewish troops (v. 36). “… Esdrias and his men had been fighting for a long time and were exhausted …”.

That might explain the “sword”.

 

Two: More significantly, after a Maccabean victory over Nicanor, Judas Maccabeus gets this Esdrias (8:23) “to read the sacred book aloud …”.

 

Is this not what Ezra did? (Nehemiah 8:1-3): “… all the people … asked Ezra the scribe to bring the Book of the Law of Moses which Yahweh had prescribed for Israel. … Ezra the priest brought the Law before the assembly …. On the square before the Water Gate … he read from the book from early morning till noon …”.

 

Razis will die easily one of the most extraordinary deaths in the Bible, falling upon his own sword (2 Maccabees 14:37-46):

 

A certain Razis, one of the elders of Jerusalem, was denounced to Nicanor as a man who loved his compatriots and was very well thought of and for his goodwill was called father of the Jews. For before the days of separation, he had been accused of Judaism, and he had most zealously risked body and life for Judaism. Nicanor, wishing to exhibit the enmity that he had for the Jews, sent more than five hundred soldiers to arrest him, for he thought that by arresting him he would do them an injury. When the troops were about to capture the tower and were forcing the door of the courtyard, they ordered that fire be brought and the doors burned. Being surrounded, Razis fell upon his own sword, preferring to die nobly rather than to fall into the hands of sinners and suffer outrages unworthy of his noble birth. But in the heat of the struggle he did not hit exactly, and the crowd was now rushing in through the doors.

He courageously ran up on the wall and bravely threw himself down into the crowd. But as they quickly drew back, a space opened and he fell in the middle of the empty space. Still alive and aflame with anger, he rose, and though his blood gushed forth and his wounds were severe he ran through the crowd, and standing upon a steep rock, with his blood now completely drained from him, he tore out his entrails, took them in both hands, and hurled them at the crowd, calling upon the Lord of life and spirit to give them back to him again. This was the manner of his death.

 

Saint Peter with sword

 

This is another famous incident.

Peter draws the sword to protect Jesus in the Garden (Matthew.26:51-52):

 

With that, one of Jesus’ companions reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.

‘Put your sword back in its place’, Jesus said to him, ‘for all who draw the sword will die by the sword’.

 

Peter, who may have been a Simeonite, rather than a Levite:

 

Peter as a potential descendant of the Simeonite prophet Jonah

 

(3) Peter as a potential descendant of the Simeonite prophet Jonah

 

will become High Priest of the newer spiritual order established by Jesus Christ.

 

Sunday, October 4, 2026

Joseph and Moses loom large in Egyptian dynastic history

 



by

 Damien F. Mackey

 

Joseph and Moses serve to knit together Egypt’s early dynastic history, and they even bring into synchronicity the Old Kingdom with the so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom.

  

Introduction

 

Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) renders to Joseph the highest praise (49:15): “… no man like Joseph has been born, and his bones are cared for”.

Joseph, a saviour of Egypt during the Famine, may have said this very thing of himself. For, in what was one of his many Egyptian guises, as I think (see below), he will say:

 

“I am a man without equal …. I am the front of people and the back of people

because (my) like will not exist; he will not exist.

(My) like could not have been born; he was not born”.

 

Moses, on the other hand, would probably never have said anything like this about himself. Although it was later written of him that (Acts 7:22): “Moses was educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians and was powerful in speech and action”, a contemporary view of him was this (Numbers 12:3): “Now Moses was a very humble man, more so than any man on the face of the earth”.

 

Both holy men had reason to boast.

 

The powerful deeds of Moses in Egypt, and afterwards, are well known and popular.

 

But Joseph achieved something that is also totally singular in the history of the world. He was able, on the basis of his God-given ability to interpret dreams, to persuade Pharaoh (perhaps young) to give him virtually unlimited power in the land, in order to make massive preparations for a Famine that would not yet emerge for some seven years. “… no man like Joseph has been born …”.

 

Moses had grown up as a presumed son of a later dynastic Pharaoh, and had eventually succeeded to the throne. But, as the royal power was not to his liking (cf. Hebrews 11:24-25), he soon abdicated, being content to serve the Egyptians as a high official and a literary sage. 

Joseph had arrived in Egypt as a foreigner and a slave, but he would be catapulted into becoming second only to Pharaoh himself (Genesis 41:43).

So competent was Joseph, however, that he seems to have eclipsed even the Pharaoh.

 

Thus, despite some similarities, we have two very different characters, personalities, following two very different career paths. The meek and humble Moses, brought up in all the trappings of royalty, would put these behind him. The super-confident and somewhat boastful Joseph, a foreign slave, so rose up in Egypt as to become a quasi-Pharaoh.  

 

Joseph and Moses serve to knit together Egypt’s early dynastic history, and they even bring into synchronicity the Old Kingdom with the so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom.

 

Ancient tradition ascribes to Joseph and to Moses the introduction of some epochal innovations. Joseph is even said to have introduced hieroglyphics to Egypt. While that cannot be correct, what we shall find is that he may actually have been the first to make sentences out of the hieroglyphics. He may also have introduced the Heb Sed festival, and the cartouche to enclose the royal name (a Third Dynasty initiative) – this apart from his incredible Famine thwarting infrastructural projects.

Finally, Joseph seems to have brought to Old Kingdom Egypt a form of monotheism. 

 

The Jew Artapanus wrote of Moses (Eusebius, Preparation for the Gospel 9.27.1-37): 

“As a grown man he taught humanity many useful things. For he invented boats, machines for laying stones, Egyptian weapons, and engines for drawing water and for war, and he invented philosophy (philosophia). Furthermore, he divided the country into thirty-six districts (nomoi)”. 

 

The singular, remarkable Joseph

 

“Then Pharaoh said to Joseph, ‘I am Pharaoh,

but without your word no one will lift hand or foot in all Egypt’.”

 

Genesis 41:44

 

To keep it as simple as possible I shall be referring here only to some few of the many alter egos under which we may find the biblical Joseph in dynastic Egypt.

 

Let us start with the easily explained Den (Udimu), located to Egypt’s First Dynasty.

 

His names perfectly sum up Joseph. For Den was:

 

Usaphais (Usaph = Joseph);

Khasti = foreigner;

Den = Bringer of Water.

 

That is: Joseph, the foreigner, who brings [us] water.

 

And provide water for a parched, Famine-wracked Egypt is precisely what Joseph had managed to do with his erection of large temporary dams and his creation of some vital new waterways.

 

For even the important Lake Faiyum appears to have dried up during Egypt’s protracted Famine.

 

Two pharaonic names represent Joseph’s (Den’s) Famine Pharaoh, viz. Djer and Djet, during whose reign First Dynasty Egypt suffered a severe Famine:

 

Taking a Djet to Djoser’s famine

 

(3) Taking a Djet to Djoser's Famine

 

Djer also stands for the Third Dynasty Famine Pharaoh, Horus Netjerikhet, whose famous Vizier, Imhotep, saved Egypt from a seven-year Famine.

Many have rightly recognised Imhotep as the biblical Joseph.

 

Djet also stands for the Eleventh Dynasty Famine Pharaoh, Horus Netjerihedjet (Mentuhotep II), of Egypt’s so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom, again a Famine era for Egypt. Thus, as I noted at the beginning,

 

Joseph and Moses serve to knit together Egypt’s early dynastic history, and they even bring into synchronicity the Old Kingdom with the so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom.

 

Contrary to what is commonly thought, though, the Third Dynasty Famine Pharaoh, Horus Netjerikhet, was not Djoser.

 

Djoser (Zoser) was yet another version of Joseph/Imhotep, viz. Khasekhemwy Hetep-imef (Hetep-imef = Imhotep), whom Egyptologists have floating awkwardly between the Second and the Third Egyptian dynasties.

Much of Joseph’s massive infrastructural Famine project can be found in the huge temporary granaries built by Khasekhemwy, the Shunet el-Zebib at Abydos, for instance, and, most probably, the Gisr el-Mudir at Saqqara.

 

Apart from Den and Khasekhemwy-Imhotep, for Joseph, I would like to mention just two more of his many Egyptian alter egos: viz. Seth-Peribsen and Ankhtifi.

 

Seth-Peribsen appears to have introduced some form of monotheism to Old Kingdom (Second Dynasty) Egypt in the form of the foreign god, Set.

 

The Heb Sed festival, likely introduced by Den, may perhaps be a celebration of Set.

 

Certainly the festival, in its early form, contains biblical (Genesis-like) elements:

 

Sed Festival may have been inaugurated by Den-Djoser

 

(5) Sed Festival may have been inaugurated by Den-Djoser

 

The first full sentence written in mature hieroglyphs so far discovered was found on a seal impression in the tomb of Seth-Peribsen.

 

Now I conclude this singular, remarkable Joseph section with the Famine hero, Ankhtifi, a name that I have suggested elsewhere may be a hypocoristicon of Joseph’s given Egyptian name, Zaphenath paneah (Genesis 41:45).

 

Ankhtifi is the boastful character whom we met at the beginning of this article, who had boldly proclaimed (at least through the writings of the Egyptian scribes):

 

(My) like could not have been born; he was not born”.

 

He will also, most singularly, fail to make mention even of his contemporary Pharaoh:

 

Egypt’s high official, Ankhtifi, outboasts even great Senenmut

 

(5) Egypt’s high official, Ankhtifi, outboasts even great Senenmut

 

The reluctant leader, Moses

 

“Moreover, the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt,

in the sight of Pharaoh’s servants and in the sight of the people”.

 

Exodus 11:3

 

These same words could well have been written of Joseph.

 

As I commented about Joseph above, so now I say in the case of Moses: To keep it as simple as possible I shall be referring here only to some few of the many alter egos under which we may find the biblical [Moses] in dynastic Egypt.

 

In this case, let us start with the tradition (Artapanus again) that the Egyptian princess who drew Moses from the water, and who consequently named him (Exodus 2:10): “… the daughter of Pharaoh … called his name Moses and she said, ‘Because I drew him out of the water’,” was one “Merris”,  who became married to “Chenephres”.

 

This information will be like a golden thread running through our historical reconstruction of Moses.

 

Basically, “Merris” is the Egyptian name, Meresankh (“she loves life”), or the inverted Ankhesenmerire (also rendered as Ankhesenpepi), while “Chenephres” stands for Khaneferre, or the inverted Nefer-ka-re (“the soul of Ra is perfect”).

 

We find Neferkare, for instance, as pharaoh Pepi (I/II) of Egypt’s Sixth Dynasty, with Moses as his predecessor, the so far poorly understood, briefly reigning pharaoh, Userkare.

 

Here we encounter the very same traditional (and biblical) scenario of “Chenephres” - married to an Ankhesenmerire (“Merris”) - who was jealous of Moses (who had abdicated the throne), and who eventually had the opportunity to pursue Moses out of Egypt and into the desert. This is a real historical situation: Userkare - Wikipedia

“The representations of some high officials of the period have been deliberately chiselled out in their tombs and their titles altered, for instance the word "king" being replaced by that of "desert". Egyptologists thus suspect that Pepi might have tried to erase all memory of Userkare from official records, monuments, tombs and artefacts”.

 

            Name, “Moses”

 

While Userkare may not be a Moses-like name, the biblical name is discernible (so I believe) in some of the alter egos that I have suggested for Moses. For instance, in the name Sinuhe, the famous character in Egyptian literature whose flight from an enraged pharaoh Sesostris I, again a Neferkare, is very roughly based upon the flight of Moses from that same Pharaoh.

 

This is a Twelfth Dynasty, so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom, incident: Joseph and Moses … even bringing into synchronicity the Old Kingdom with the so-called ‘Middle’ Kingdom.

 

Presumably, the Egyptian scribes would not have been familiar with the secret of “Merris”, how she came to have the baby, Moses, in the first place and the meaning of the name that she gave to him.

In names such as Sinuhe, (Pharaoh) Niuserre, and (General) Nysumontu, the name Moses, Mu (Water) Sa (Son of) plus (Theophoric or God Name) = “Water Baby”, can be discerned. Nu, Niu, Ny, equate to Egyptian Mu (mw), “Water”, whilst the Si element in Sinuhe means “Son” (Sir Flinders Petrie).

 

Moses commonly occurs with the Uni type element as well. See my article:

 

Ini, Weni, Iny, Moses

 

(3) Ini, Weni, Iny, Moses

 

With Weni of the Sixth Dynasty, in his famous Autobiography, Egyptian hieroglyphic writing reaches a peak of literary excellence.

Weni was, like his Twelfth Dynasty alter ego, Mentuhotep, the Vizier and Chief Judge of Egypt (cf. Exodus 2:14): ‘Who made you Ruler and Judge over us?’

 

In the Fifth Dynasty pharaoh, Niuserre Ini, who was later deified, the Niu and Ini elements of the Egyptian names of Moses are found together.

 

Finally, Moses as a sage, writer, and teacher of Instructions, can be found in the deified Ptahhotep (pharaoh Djedefptah), wrongly thought (as I once had) to be Joseph, because of the association of him with 110 years (cf. Genesis 50:22).

But his Fifth Dynasty location fits Moses, and not Joseph.

He is also the teacher of Instructions, once again a Chief Judge and Vizier, Kagemni (that Ni element again?) of Egypt’s Sixth Dynasty.